Positives: The search results page is incredibly inviting and attractive. The designers realized that users do not move beyond the first two pages of results in a standard list display so they must have worked on a alternative to the gigantic list. The results are impressive as your eye easily moves around the page instead of focusing directly at the top of a list and moving down. Also, there is more descriptive content under the link than in other search engines.
The liberal use of images, logos, and graphics.You will find it confusing when you move to the second and third pages of the results and see the same pictures that you saw on the first page of results. Your first inclination is that the same pages are popping up again and again but they are simply using the images again and again with unique links. Obviously, if you do this then you are misrepresenting the link as that image may have nothing to do with the link. This isn't the point though. The point is to provide visual access to the subject matter. I like this approach much better than a separate image search or a distracting frame filled with pictures.
The explore more categories on the right are excellent. My Google searches often lead to more and more refined versions of my original search query. By checking the explore by category options on the right I can take my search to another direction and one that I might not have originally thought of before.
Negatives: The results are odd and don't always make much sense. A search for an author gives you many results on books to purchase but shows very little that discusses the life of the author. Also, the results seem to be absent of any timeliness. Typing in the latest news makers gives you very little that points to recent activity involving the subject. The results seem to be heavy on Wikipedia and Mahalo entries which is fine but offers a rather static feel to the results rather than enlivening the ever expanding nature of the web and the information found in it.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
The End Result
My indoctrination into web 2.0 and library 2.0 has come to an end as I have completed Helene Blowers' 23 Things and Meredith Farkas and Company's 5 Weeks to A Social Library. Below is a list of some of my most significant discoveries.
1. Delicious is now one of my most used web tools. I hadn't used it in the past because I wasn't interested in a tool that I thought was a duplication of something I didn't use that often anyway (bookmarks). I have a pretty good memory and recall and since Google is so easy to use I thought I was saving a step by just repeating searches. But then I realized how inefficient and time consuming that could be if my memory wasn't as strong as I expected. With Delicious, I don't have to have superhuman memory or incredible search skills. Whenever I find a site that will be useful for research or returning to later I simply post it in Delicious and tag it so I can locate it later. Using Delicious has already improved presentations, instruction sessions, and reference help.
To make life really easy, I have installed the Delicious add-ons into Firefox so I don't even have to locate the Delicious homepage to post an article.
2. StumbleUpon: see this post for my thoughts on this search technology. It works best in conjunction with Delicious. I am not convinced that I will be using SU a year from now.
3. WordPress: I had always used Blogger before but messing around with WordPress has been fun and beneficial to other blog efforts I am involved in.
4. Flickr: Photos have always put me off because of how you usually have to adjust and modify them once they are on your hard drive. I don't have the time or in most cases the expertise to do this easily. Flickr takes the adjustment level out of photo storage and continues to find new ways to make photo sharing enjoyable.
5. If I spend 70% of my work time on the internet it just makes more sense for me to want to do my wordprocessing and database doodling with a web based service that I can return to on my laptop or at home instead of holding my work hostage on my office computer. Google Docs is easy to use and improving all the time and I have used Zoho some as well.
6. This entire process has inspired me to share some of the things I have learned with my co-workers and we are in our second month of training in Web 2.0. The response has been very positive.
1. Delicious is now one of my most used web tools. I hadn't used it in the past because I wasn't interested in a tool that I thought was a duplication of something I didn't use that often anyway (bookmarks). I have a pretty good memory and recall and since Google is so easy to use I thought I was saving a step by just repeating searches. But then I realized how inefficient and time consuming that could be if my memory wasn't as strong as I expected. With Delicious, I don't have to have superhuman memory or incredible search skills. Whenever I find a site that will be useful for research or returning to later I simply post it in Delicious and tag it so I can locate it later. Using Delicious has already improved presentations, instruction sessions, and reference help.
To make life really easy, I have installed the Delicious add-ons into Firefox so I don't even have to locate the Delicious homepage to post an article.
2. StumbleUpon: see this post for my thoughts on this search technology. It works best in conjunction with Delicious. I am not convinced that I will be using SU a year from now.
3. WordPress: I had always used Blogger before but messing around with WordPress has been fun and beneficial to other blog efforts I am involved in.
4. Flickr: Photos have always put me off because of how you usually have to adjust and modify them once they are on your hard drive. I don't have the time or in most cases the expertise to do this easily. Flickr takes the adjustment level out of photo storage and continues to find new ways to make photo sharing enjoyable.
5. If I spend 70% of my work time on the internet it just makes more sense for me to want to do my wordprocessing and database doodling with a web based service that I can return to on my laptop or at home instead of holding my work hostage on my office computer. Google Docs is easy to use and improving all the time and I have used Zoho some as well.
6. This entire process has inspired me to share some of the things I have learned with my co-workers and we are in our second month of training in Web 2.0. The response has been very positive.
Wednesday, July 9, 2008
Book Wrangling Recommends: Paste Magazine
When I was growing up I couldn't wait for my weekly Sports Illustrated to show up in the mail. I would read each issue cover to cover. Now, the magazine that I anticipate receiving is Paste. Their tag line is Signs of Life in Music, Film, and Culture. This pretty much sums up the things that I enjoy watching or listening to. If an art form doesn't have something to offer spiritually or emotionally I don't have time for it. So, Paste serves as a good guide to modern culture for a father of three who can't keep up with blogs, YouTube videos, and hasn't had cable in 10 1/2 years.
And get this, last spring Paste held a promotion where they told prospective subscribers to pay whatever they want. What a risk but one that landed new subscribers like me. On top of that, each issue comes with a CD sampler of new music. I have discovered several quality acts through these CDs. I would highly recommend Paste for any fans of interesting music, film, or literature.
And get this, last spring Paste held a promotion where they told prospective subscribers to pay whatever they want. What a risk but one that landed new subscribers like me. On top of that, each issue comes with a CD sampler of new music. I have discovered several quality acts through these CDs. I would highly recommend Paste for any fans of interesting music, film, or literature.
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
Can You Relate?
I have seen this YouTube clip several times and it continues to make me laugh. You don't even need the subtitles to find the humor in it. It makes me think about learning curves. For any technology, there is an initial learning curve that seems insurmountable but once you move through the first exposure everything comes quick and easy. Even in an academic setting, there are times when we need to break down a resource or a database to its basic level or the student just will not make any progress with their research objective. Patience is a needed approach to reference work because every student interaction is different.
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Stumble On
I have recently become a stumbler through StumbleUpon.com. I have a cautious approach to new technology. I enjoy finding them and playing with them but I am not that interested in adding more to my online experience. I am trying to simplify my online environment and adding plugin after plugin or toolbars or widgets is a waste of time and a good way to muddle up my computer screen and browser.
But when I came across a blog post about using web 2.0 tools to be more efficient with your information I took the plunge using StumbleUpon (SU). I am cautiously hooked. SU takes a set of personal preferences and with a click of a button starts feeding you websites that match your preferences. If you like the website you can rate it with a thumbs up and if you dislike it you can rate it with a thumbs down. Sites that have not been rated before will open up a box for you to review the site for other Stumblers. By consistently rating the sites that you see you set the pattern for the type of sites that will be fed to you in the future.
The best use of this for me is combining SU with Del.icio.us. When SU sends me a site that I think will be helpful for personal use or for library use I will tag the site in Del.icio.us for future reference. The amount of great library sites that I have found through SU is tremendous.
The aspect that I have not totally grasped is how to use SU to locate the best sites on a particular subject like you would using Google. You can go to SU and do a keyword search but I assume that the value of the site is based on Stumbler reviews which would limit the options because of a potential for many sites not being reviewed.
When using any search engine I often get the feeling that many times there is an "on the nose" website that is just beyond my grasp. SU seems to feed you quality websites and your ability to rate the sites instantly customizes what comes next. I am still in the "new toy" phase of using SU but I don't foresee myself eliminating this tool anywhere in the near future.
But when I came across a blog post about using web 2.0 tools to be more efficient with your information I took the plunge using StumbleUpon (SU). I am cautiously hooked. SU takes a set of personal preferences and with a click of a button starts feeding you websites that match your preferences. If you like the website you can rate it with a thumbs up and if you dislike it you can rate it with a thumbs down. Sites that have not been rated before will open up a box for you to review the site for other Stumblers. By consistently rating the sites that you see you set the pattern for the type of sites that will be fed to you in the future.
The best use of this for me is combining SU with Del.icio.us. When SU sends me a site that I think will be helpful for personal use or for library use I will tag the site in Del.icio.us for future reference. The amount of great library sites that I have found through SU is tremendous.
The aspect that I have not totally grasped is how to use SU to locate the best sites on a particular subject like you would using Google. You can go to SU and do a keyword search but I assume that the value of the site is based on Stumbler reviews which would limit the options because of a potential for many sites not being reviewed.
When using any search engine I often get the feeling that many times there is an "on the nose" website that is just beyond my grasp. SU seems to feed you quality websites and your ability to rate the sites instantly customizes what comes next. I am still in the "new toy" phase of using SU but I don't foresee myself eliminating this tool anywhere in the near future.
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Web- based Applications
I use Google Docs (which includes a spreadsheet application) frequently and find excuses to use it more often. What a wonderful use of web technology. You take the most common elements of Microsoft Word and Excel, allow global web use, sharing capabilities, and convenience and you have a recipe for a really great product. Who wants to worry about disks or jump drives that we often lose? Who wants to worry about sending attachments that we may forget to include or the person we are sending it to has trouble opening it?
What exactly are we missing by not using the Microsoft Office products? Enhancements, shortcuts, and advance uses are for expert users not for the average office worker, educator, or student. In a recent ministry effort in our apartment complex my wife and I had to keep a current database on our residents. We did it all on Google Docs and it was a simple, lifesaver. I am all for web-based applications and see them only improving as the open source trend continually advances these products.
What exactly are we missing by not using the Microsoft Office products? Enhancements, shortcuts, and advance uses are for expert users not for the average office worker, educator, or student. In a recent ministry effort in our apartment complex my wife and I had to keep a current database on our residents. We did it all on Google Docs and it was a simple, lifesaver. I am all for web-based applications and see them only improving as the open source trend continually advances these products.
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Play Time!!
Inspired by the activities that I have chronicled on this blog and the work of Meredith Farkas et al. and Helene Blowers, I am starting a training program among our staff and faculty on web 2.0/library 2.0.
The program consists of me presenting a quick and simple overview tutorial on the topic of the month (June will be on blogging) during a library staff meeting. At the end of the instruction session, I will present the group with an activity for them to do on their own before our next session in July. I will also provide weekly emails chronicling the discoveries that the staff have made through their own "play time" with the technology. Then, once a month, we will all gather together for a "play time" where we can discuss the technology and practice using it ourselves.
I announced this activity at our staff meeting today and it was well received though with some apprehension by our more tech inexperienced staff. I encouraged them that this was a low stress exercise that was focused on the play aspect and the need to have fun with things we find intimidating. I hope to detail some of my observations through this blog.
The program consists of me presenting a quick and simple overview tutorial on the topic of the month (June will be on blogging) during a library staff meeting. At the end of the instruction session, I will present the group with an activity for them to do on their own before our next session in July. I will also provide weekly emails chronicling the discoveries that the staff have made through their own "play time" with the technology. Then, once a month, we will all gather together for a "play time" where we can discuss the technology and practice using it ourselves.
I announced this activity at our staff meeting today and it was well received though with some apprehension by our more tech inexperienced staff. I encouraged them that this was a low stress exercise that was focused on the play aspect and the need to have fun with things we find intimidating. I hope to detail some of my observations through this blog.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)